City of Arlington v. Federal Communications Commission
569 U.S. 290 · Decided May 20, 2013 · Supreme Court of the United States
Record summary. This page is generated from the Supreme Court Database’s coded data about the case. It describes who decided what, not the Court’s reasoning. Read the opinion itself before relying on it. Not legal advice.
At a glance
City of Arlington v. Federal Communications Commission was decided on May 20, 2013 by a vote of 6–3. The Court affirmed the lower court's decision. Justice Antonin Scalia wrote the opinion of the Court. SCDB classifies its main issue as “Judicial review of agency actions” in the Judicial Power area.
Read the opinion
Case details
- Citations
- 569 U.S. 290 · 133 S. Ct. 1863 · 185 L. Ed. 2d 941 · 2013 U.S. LEXIS 3838
- Docket number
- 11-1545
- Decided
- May 20, 2013
- Argued
- January 16, 2013
- Court era
- Roberts Court
- Decision type
- Opinion of the Court (orally argued)
- Disposition
- Affirmed
- Outcome for petitioner
- The petitioning party did not receive a favorable disposition
- Vote
- 6–3
- Majority opinion
- Antonin Scalia
- Opinion assigned by
- Antonin Scalia
- How the case arrived
- Certiorari
- Issue (SCDB)
- Judicial review of agency actions
- Issue area
- Judicial Power
- Legal provision
- Communications Act of 1934
- Type of law
- Federal statute
- Decision direction (SCDB)
- Conservative what this means
How the Justices voted
| Justice | Vote | Separate writing |
|---|---|---|
| Justice Antonin Scalia | Majority | Wrote an opinion |
| Justice Anthony M. Kennedy | Dissent | |
| Justice Clarence Thomas | Majority | |
| Justice Ruth Bader Ginsburg | Majority | |
| Justice Stephen G. Breyer | Special concurrence | Wrote an opinion |
| Chief Justice John G. Roberts Jr. | Dissent | Wrote an opinion |
| Justice Samuel A. Alito Jr. | Dissent | |
| Justice Sonia Sotomayor | Majority | |
| Justice Elena Kagan | Majority |
Full case caption
City of Arlington, Texas, et Al., Petitioners v. Federal Communications Commission et al.
SCDB identifiers: case 2012-044, docket 2012-044-01.
Related decisions
Other cases on “Judicial review of agency actions”
- Kathleen Sebelius v. Auburn Regional Medical Center
- Elgin v. Department of Treasury
- Mach Mining, LLC v. Equal Employment Opportunity Commission
- Astra USA, Inc. v. Santa Clara County
- New Process Steel, L. P. v. National Labor Relations Board
- Federal Communications Commission v. Fox Television Stations, Inc.
Cases on the same legal provision: Communications Act of 1934
- Talk America v. Michigan Bell Telephone Company Dba AT&T Michigan
- Global Crossing Telecommunications, Inc. v. Metrophones Telecommunications, Inc.
- Federal Communications Commission v. Prometheus Radio Project
- AT&T Corporation v. Iowa Utilities Board
- American Telephone and Telegraph Company v. Central Office Telephone, Inc.
- MCI Telecommunications Corporation v. American Telephone and Telegraph Company
Same Term, same area (Judicial Power)
- Kathleen Sebelius v. Auburn Regional Medical Center
- James R. Clapper, Jr. v. Amnesty International USA
- The Standard Fire Insurance Company v. Greg Knowles
- Comcast Corporation v. Caroline Behrend
- Esther Kiobel v. Royal Dutch Petroleum Co.
- Jonathan Edward Boyer v. Louisiana
Source: Supreme Court Database, 2026 Release 01 (data file dated September 8, 2026). Imported into CaseTrail November 5, 2026. Coverage: decisions from the 1946 through 2025 Terms. Methodology · Report an error