Chicago v. United States
366 U.S. 745 · Decided June 5, 1961 · Supreme Court of the United States
Record summary. This page is generated from the Supreme Court Database’s coded data about the case. It describes who decided what, not the Court’s reasoning. Read the opinion itself before relying on it. Not legal advice.
At a glance
Chicago v. United States was decided on June 5, 1961 by a vote of 6–2. The Court affirmed the lower court's decision. Justice Tom C. Clark wrote the opinion of the Court. SCDB classifies its main issue as “Railroad regulation” in the Economic Activity area.
Read the opinion
Case details
- Citations
- 366 U.S. 745 · 81 S. Ct. 1630 · 6 L. Ed. 2d 772 · 1961 U.S. LEXIS 1971
- Docket number
- 306
- Decided
- June 5, 1961
- Argued
- May 2, 1961
- Court era
- Warren Court
- Decision type
- Opinion of the Court (orally argued)
- Disposition
- Affirmed
- Outcome for petitioner
- The petitioning party did not receive a favorable disposition
- Vote
- 6–2
- Majority opinion
- Tom C. Clark
- Opinion assigned by
- Earl Warren
- How the case arrived
- Appeal
- Issue (SCDB)
- Railroad regulation
- Issue area
- Economic Activity
- Legal provision
- Interstate Commerce Act
- Type of law
- Federal statute
- Decision direction (SCDB)
- Conservative what this means
How the Justices voted
| Justice | Vote | Separate writing |
|---|---|---|
| Justice Hugo L. Black | Dissent | |
| Justice Felix Frankfurter | Majority | |
| Justice William O. Douglas | Dissent | Wrote an opinion |
| Justice Tom C. Clark | Majority | Wrote an opinion |
| Chief Justice Earl Warren | Majority | |
| Justice John M. Harlan II | Majority | |
| Justice William J. Brennan Jr. | Majority | |
| Justice Charles E. Whittaker | Majority |
Did not participate: Potter Stewart.
Full case caption
Chicago, Milwaukee, St. Paul & Pacific Railroad Co. v. United States et al.
SCDB identifiers: case 1960-114, docket 1960-114-01.
Related decisions
Other cases on “Railroad regulation”
- H. K. Porter Co., Inc. v. Central Vermont Railway, Inc.
- Union Pacific Railroad Co. v. United States
- United States v. Seaboard Air Line Railroad Co.
- New Jersey v. New York
- Arrow Transportation Co. v. Southern Railway Co.
- Interstate Commerce Commission v. New York
Cases on the same legal provision: Interstate Commerce Act
- Brotherhood of Maintenance of Way Employes v. United States
- Boynton v. Virginia
- Interstate Commerce Commission v. J-T Transport Co., Inc.
- United States v. Drum
- American Trucking Associations, Inc. v. United States
- Minneapolis & St. Louis Railway Co. v. United States
Same Term, same area (Economic Activity)
- Michalic v. Cleveland Tankers, Inc.
- Waterman Steamship Corp. v. Dugan & McNamara, Inc.
- New York v. Henagan
- Thomas v. Virginia
- United States v. Mississippi Valley Generating Co.
- Lewis v. Manufacturers National Bank of Detroit
Source: Supreme Court Database, 2026 Release 01 (data file dated September 8, 2026). Imported into CaseTrail November 5, 2026. Coverage: decisions from the 1946 through 2025 Terms. Methodology · Report an error