Chaunt v. United States
364 U.S. 350 · Decided November 14, 1960 · Supreme Court of the United States
Record summary. This page is generated from the Supreme Court Database’s coded data about the case. It describes who decided what, not the Court’s reasoning. Read the opinion itself before relying on it. Not legal advice.
At a glance
Chaunt v. United States was decided on November 14, 1960 by a vote of 6–3. The Court reversed the lower court's decision and remanded the case. Justice William O. Douglas wrote the opinion of the Court. SCDB classifies its main issue as “Immigration, loss of citizenship or denaturalization” in the Civil Rights area.
Read the opinion
Case details
- Citations
- 364 U.S. 350 · 81 S. Ct. 147 · 5 L. Ed. 2d 120 · 1960 U.S. LEXIS 190
- Docket number
- 22
- Decided
- November 14, 1960
- Argued
- October 17, 1960
- Court era
- Warren Court
- Decision type
- Opinion of the Court (orally argued)
- Disposition
- Reversed and remanded
- Outcome for petitioner
- The petitioning party received a favorable disposition
- Vote
- 6–3
- Majority opinion
- William O. Douglas
- Opinion assigned by
- Earl Warren
- How the case arrived
- Certiorari
- Issue area
- Civil Rights
- Legal provision
- Immigration and Nationality statutes
- Type of law
- Federal statute
- Decision direction (SCDB)
- Liberal what this means
How the Justices voted
| Justice | Vote | Separate writing |
|---|---|---|
| Justice Hugo L. Black | Majority | |
| Justice Felix Frankfurter | Majority | |
| Justice William O. Douglas | Majority | Wrote an opinion |
| Justice Tom C. Clark | Dissent | Wrote an opinion |
| Chief Justice Earl Warren | Majority | |
| Justice John M. Harlan II | Majority | |
| Justice William J. Brennan Jr. | Majority | |
| Justice Charles E. Whittaker | Dissent | |
| Justice Potter Stewart | Dissent |
Full case caption
Chaunt v. United States
SCDB identifiers: case 1960-006, docket 1960-006-01.
Related decisions
Other cases on “Immigration, loss of citizenship or denaturalization”
- Polites v. United States
- Costello v. United States
- United States v. Lucchese
- Rusk v. Cort
- Kennedy v. Mendoza-MartinezLaw held unconstitutional
- Schneider v. Rusk
Cases on the same legal provision: Immigration and Nationality statutes
- Mackey v. Mendoza-Martinez
- Leng May Ma v. Barber
- Rogers v. Quan
- United States v. Cores
- Dessalernos v. Savoretti
- Rosenberg v. Fleuti
Same Term, same area (Civil Rights)
- Gomillion v. LightfootLaw held unconstitutional
- Polites v. United States
- Boynton v. Virginia
- Bush v. Orleans Parish School BoardLaw held unconstitutional
- Monroe v. Pape
- Costello v. United States
Source: Supreme Court Database, 2026 Release 01 (data file dated September 8, 2026). Imported into CaseTrail November 5, 2026. Coverage: decisions from the 1946 through 2025 Terms. Methodology · Report an error