CaseTrail

Charles A. Rehberg v. James P. Paulk

566 U.S. 356 · Decided April 2, 2012 · Supreme Court of the United States

Record summary. This page is generated from the Supreme Court Database’s coded data about the case. It describes who decided what, not the Court’s reasoning. Read the opinion itself before relying on it. Not legal advice.

At a glance

Charles A. Rehberg v. James P. Paulk was decided on April 2, 2012 unanimously (9–0). The Court affirmed the lower court's decision. Justice Samuel A. Alito Jr. wrote the opinion of the Court. SCDB classifies its main issue as “Liability under civil rights acts” in the Civil Rights area.

Read the opinion

Case details

Citations
566 U.S. 356 · 132 S. Ct. 1497 · 182 L. Ed. 2d 593 · 2012 U.S. LEXIS 2711
Docket number
10-788
Decided
April 2, 2012
Argued
November 1, 2011
Court era
Roberts Court
Decision type
Opinion of the Court (orally argued)
Disposition
Affirmed
Outcome for petitioner
The petitioning party did not receive a favorable disposition
Vote
9–0 (unanimous)
Majority opinion
Samuel A. Alito Jr.
Opinion assigned by
John G. Roberts Jr.
How the case arrived
Certiorari
Issue area
Civil Rights
Legal provision
42 U.S.C. § 1983 (Reconstruction Civil Rights Acts)
Type of law
Federal statute
Decision direction (SCDB)
Conservative what this means

How the Justices voted

Full case caption

Charles A. Rehberg, Petitioner v. James P. Paulk

SCDB identifiers: case 2011-045, docket 2011-045-01.

Other cases on “Liability under civil rights acts”

See all

Cases on the same legal provision: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 (Reconstruction Civil Rights Acts)

Same Term, same area (Civil Rights)

See all

Source: Supreme Court Database, 2026 Release 01 (data file dated September 8, 2026). Imported into CaseTrail November 5, 2026. Coverage: decisions from the 1946 through 2025 Terms. Methodology · Report an error