Carlos Jimenez v. Nathaniel Quarterman
555 U.S. 113 · Decided January 13, 2009 · Supreme Court of the United States
At a glance
Carlos Jimenez v. Nathaniel Quarterman was decided on January 13, 2009 unanimously (9–0). The Court reversed the lower court's decision and remanded the case. Justice Clarence Thomas wrote the opinion of the Court. SCDB classifies its main issue as “Untimely filing” in the Judicial Power area.
Read the opinion
Case details
- Citations
- 555 U.S. 113 · 129 S. Ct. 681 · 172 L. Ed. 2d 475 · 2009 U.S. LEXIS 579
- Docket number
- 07-6984
- Decided
- January 13, 2009
- Argued
- November 4, 2008
- Court era
- Roberts Court
- Decision type
- Opinion of the Court (orally argued)
- Disposition
- Reversed and remanded
- Outcome for petitioner
- The petitioning party received a favorable disposition
- Vote
- 9–0 (unanimous)
- Majority opinion
- Clarence Thomas
- Opinion assigned by
- John G. Roberts Jr.
- How the case arrived
- Certiorari
- Issue (SCDB)
- Untimely filing
- Issue area
- Judicial Power
- Legal provision
- 28 U.S.C. §§ 2241–2255 (habeas corpus)
- Type of law
- Federal statute
- Decision direction (SCDB)
- Liberal what this means
How the Justices voted
| Justice | Vote | Separate writing |
|---|---|---|
| Justice John Paul Stevens | Majority | |
| Justice Antonin Scalia | Majority | |
| Justice Anthony M. Kennedy | Majority | |
| Justice David H. Souter | Majority | |
| Justice Clarence Thomas | Majority | Wrote an opinion |
| Justice Ruth Bader Ginsburg | Majority | |
| Justice Stephen G. Breyer | Majority | |
| Chief Justice John G. Roberts Jr. | Majority | |
| Justice Samuel A. Alito Jr. | Majority |
Full case caption
Carlos Jimenez v. Nathaniel Quarterman, Director, Texas Department of Criminal Justice, Correctional Institutions Division
SCDB identifiers: case 2008-007, docket 2008-007-01.
Related decisions
Other cases on “Untimely filing”
- United States ex Rel. Irwin Eisenstein v. City of New York
- Mohawk Industries, Inc. v. Norman Carpenter
- John R. Sand & Gravel Company v. United States
- Richard F. Allen v. Daniel Siebert
- Wanda Krupski v. Costa Crociere S. P. A.
- Keith Bowles v. Harry RussellAltered precedent
Cases on the same legal provision: 28 U.S.C. §§ 2241–2255 (habeas corpus)
- Doug Waddington v. Cesar Sarausad
- Michael A. Knowles v. Alexandre Mirzayance
- Munaf v. Geren
- Stephen Danforth v. Minnesota
- Jeffrey A. Beard v. Joseph J. Kindler
- Holly Wood v. Richard F. Allen
Same Term, same area (Judicial Power)
- Edward Nathaniel Bell v. Loretta K. Kelly
- Priscilla Summers v. Earth Island Institute
- Philip Morris USA Inc. v. Mayola Williams
- Federal Communications Commission v. Fox Television Stations, Inc.
- Arthur Andersen LLP v. Wayne Carlisle
- Carlsbad Technology, Inc. v. Hif Bio, Inc.
Source: Supreme Court Database, 2026 Release 01 (data file dated September 8, 2026). Imported into CaseTrail November 5, 2026. Coverage: decisions from the 1946 through 2025 Terms. Methodology · Report an error