Camara v. Municipal Court of the City and County of San Francisco
387 U.S. 523 · Decided June 5, 1967 · Supreme Court of the United States
At a glance
Camara v. Municipal Court of the City and County of San Francisco was decided on June 5, 1967 by a vote of 6–3. The Court vacated the lower court's decision and remanded the case. Justice Byron R. White wrote the opinion of the Court. SCDB classifies its main issue as “Search and seizure (general)” in the Criminal Procedure area. SCDB codes this decision as formally altering one or more of the Court's own precedents. SCDB records that the Court declared a municipal or other local ordinance unconstitutional.
Read the opinion
Case details
- Citations
- 387 U.S. 523 · 87 S. Ct. 1727 · 18 L. Ed. 2d 930 · 1967 U.S. LEXIS 1254
- Docket number
- 92
- Decided
- June 5, 1967
- Argued
- February 15, 1967
- Court era
- Warren Court
- Decision type
- Opinion of the Court (orally argued)
- Disposition
- Vacated and remanded
- Outcome for petitioner
- The petitioning party received a favorable disposition
- Vote
- 6–3
- Majority opinion
- Byron R. White
- Opinion assigned by
- Earl Warren
- How the case arrived
- Appeal
- Issue (SCDB)
- Search and seizure (general)
- Issue area
- Criminal Procedure
- Legal provision
- Fourth Amendment
- Type of law
- Constitutional amendment
- Altered precedent
- Yes — formally altered the Court's precedent
- Held unconstitutional
- A municipal or other local ordinance
- Decision direction (SCDB)
- Liberal what this means
How the Justices voted
| Justice | Vote | Separate writing |
|---|---|---|
| Justice Hugo L. Black | Majority | |
| Justice William O. Douglas | Majority | |
| Justice Tom C. Clark | Dissent | Wrote an opinion |
| Chief Justice Earl Warren | Majority | |
| Justice John M. Harlan II | Dissent | |
| Justice William J. Brennan Jr. | Majority | |
| Justice Potter Stewart | Dissent | |
| Justice Byron R. White | Majority | Wrote an opinion |
| Justice Abe Fortas | Majority |
Full case caption
Camara v. Municipal Court of the City and County of San Francisco
SCDB identifiers: case 1966-116, docket 1966-116-01.
Related decisions
Other cases on “Search and seizure (general)”
- See v. City of SeattleLaw held unconstitutional
- Warden v. HaydenAltered precedent
- Berger v. New YorkAltered precedentLaw held unconstitutional
- Hadley v. Massachusetts
- Hoffa v. United States
- McCray v. Illinois
Cases on the same legal provision: Fourth Amendment
- Cooper v. California
- Harris v. United States
- Desist v. United States
- Kaiser v. New York
- Chambers v. Maroney
- Perini v. Colosimo
Same Term, same area (Criminal Procedure)
- Black v. United States
- Cichos v. Indiana
- O'Connor v. Ohio
- Lewis v. United States
- United States v. Fabrizio
- Hoffa v. United States
Source: Supreme Court Database, 2026 Release 01 (data file dated September 8, 2026). Imported into CaseTrail November 5, 2026. Coverage: decisions from the 1946 through 2025 Terms. Methodology · Report an error