CaseTrail

Bravo-Fernandez v. United States

137 S. Ct. 352 · Decided November 29, 2016 · Supreme Court of the United States

Record summary. This page is generated from the Supreme Court Database’s coded data about the case. It describes who decided what, not the Court’s reasoning. Read the opinion itself before relying on it. Not legal advice.

At a glance

Bravo-Fernandez v. United States was decided on November 29, 2016 unanimously (8–0). The Court affirmed the lower court's decision. Justice Ruth Bader Ginsburg wrote the opinion of the Court. SCDB classifies its main issue as “Double jeopardy” in the Criminal Procedure area.

Read the opinion

Case details

Citations
137 S. Ct. 352 · 196 L. Ed. 2d 242 · 2016 U.S. LEXIS 7269
Docket number
15-537
Decided
November 29, 2016
Argued
October 4, 2016
Court era
Roberts Court
Decision type
Opinion of the Court (orally argued)
Disposition
Affirmed
Outcome for petitioner
The petitioning party did not receive a favorable disposition
Vote
8–0 (unanimous)
Majority opinion
Ruth Bader Ginsburg
Opinion assigned by
John G. Roberts Jr.
How the case arrived
Certiorari
Issue (SCDB)
Double jeopardy
Legal provision
Fifth Amendment (double jeopardy)
Type of law
Constitutional amendment
Decision direction (SCDB)
Conservative what this means

How the Justices voted

Full case caption

Bravo-Fernandez v. United States

SCDB identifiers: case 2016-016, docket 2016-016-01.

Other cases on “Double jeopardy”

See all

Cases on the same legal provision: Fifth Amendment (double jeopardy)

Same Term, same area (Criminal Procedure)

See all

Source: Supreme Court Database, 2026 Release 01 (data file dated September 8, 2026). Imported into CaseTrail November 5, 2026. Coverage: decisions from the 1946 through 2025 Terms. Methodology · Report an error