CaseTrail

Brannan v. Stark

342 U.S. 451 · Decided March 3, 1952 · Supreme Court of the United States

Record summary. This page is generated from the Supreme Court Database’s coded data about the case. It describes who decided what, not the Court’s reasoning. Read the opinion itself before relying on it. Not legal advice.

At a glance

Brannan v. Stark was decided on March 3, 1952 by a vote of 4–3. The Court affirmed the lower court's decision. Justice Tom C. Clark wrote the opinion of the Court. SCDB classifies its main issue as “Judicial review of agency actions” in the Judicial Power area.

Read the opinion

Case details

Citations
342 U.S. 451 · 72 S. Ct. 433 · 96 L. Ed. 2d 497 · 1952 U.S. LEXIS 2709
Docket number
6
Decided
March 3, 1952
Argued
October 9, 1951
Court era
Vinson Court
Decision type
Opinion of the Court (orally argued)
Disposition
Affirmed
Outcome for petitioner
The petitioning party did not receive a favorable disposition
Vote
4–3
Majority opinion
Tom C. Clark
Opinion assigned by
Fred M. Vinson
How the case arrived
Certiorari
Issue area
Judicial Power
Legal provision
7 U.S.C. § 601
Type of law
Infrequently litigated statute
Decision direction (SCDB)
Liberal what this means

How the Justices voted

JusticeVoteSeparate writing
Justice Hugo L. BlackDissentWrote an opinion
Justice Stanley F. ReedDissent
Justice Felix FrankfurterMajority
Justice William O. DouglasDissent
Justice Harold H. BurtonMajority
Chief Justice Fred M. VinsonMajority
Justice Tom C. ClarkMajorityWrote an opinion

Did not participate: Robert H. Jackson, Sherman Minton.

Full case caption

Brannan, Secretary of Agriculture, v. Stark et al.

SCDB identifiers: case 1951-049, docket 1951-049-01.

Other cases on “Judicial review of agency actions”

See all

Cases on the same legal provision: 7 U.S.C. § 601

Same Term, same area (Judicial Power)

See all

Source: Supreme Court Database, 2026 Release 01 (data file dated September 8, 2026). Imported into CaseTrail November 5, 2026. Coverage: decisions from the 1946 through 2025 Terms. Methodology · Report an error