Boesche v. Udall
373 U.S. 472 · Decided May 27, 1963 · Supreme Court of the United States
Record summary. This page is generated from the Supreme Court Database’s coded data about the case. It describes who decided what, not the Court’s reasoning. Read the opinion itself before relying on it. Not legal advice.
At a glance
Boesche v. Udall was decided on May 27, 1963 unanimously (9–0). The Court affirmed the lower court's decision. Justice John M. Harlan II wrote the opinion of the Court. SCDB classifies its main issue as “Natural resources and environmental protection” in the Economic Activity area.
Read the opinion
Case details
- Citations
- 373 U.S. 472 · 83 S. Ct. 1373 · 10 L. Ed. 2d 491 · 1963 U.S. LEXIS 2430
- Docket number
- 332
- Decided
- May 27, 1963
- Argued
- February 25, 1963
- Court era
- Warren Court
- Decision type
- Opinion of the Court (orally argued)
- Disposition
- Affirmed
- Outcome for petitioner
- The petitioning party did not receive a favorable disposition
- Vote
- 9–0 (unanimous)
- Majority opinion
- John M. Harlan II
- Opinion assigned by
- Earl Warren
- How the case arrived
- Certiorari
- Issue (SCDB)
- Natural resources and environmental protection
- Issue area
- Economic Activity
- Legal provision
- 30 U.S.C. § 181
- Type of law
- Infrequently litigated statute
- Decision direction (SCDB)
- Liberal what this means
How the Justices voted
| Justice | Vote | Separate writing |
|---|---|---|
| Justice Hugo L. Black | Majority | |
| Justice William O. Douglas | Majority | |
| Justice Tom C. Clark | Majority | |
| Chief Justice Earl Warren | Majority | |
| Justice John M. Harlan II | Majority | Wrote an opinion |
| Justice William J. Brennan Jr. | Majority | |
| Justice Potter Stewart | Majority | |
| Justice Byron R. White | Majority | |
| Justice Arthur J. Goldberg | Majority |
Full case caption
Boesche, Administrator, v. Udall, Secretary of the Interior
SCDB identifiers: case 1962-122, docket 1962-122-01.
Related decisions
Other cases on “Natural resources and environmental protection”
- Arizona v. California
- Dugan v. Rank
- City of Fresno v. California
- Organized Village of Kake v. Egan
- United States v. Standard Oil Co.
- United States v. Republic Steel Corp.
Cases on the same legal provision: 30 U.S.C. § 181
Same Term, same area (Economic Activity)
- United States v. Loew's Incorporated
- Hewitt-Robins Incorporated v. Eastern Freight-Ways, Inc.
- Gilbertville Trucking Co., Inc. v. United States
- Pearlman v. Reliance Insurance Co.
- Federal Power Commission v. Tennessee Gas Transmission Co.
- Pensick & Gordon, Inc. v. California Motor Express
Source: Supreme Court Database, 2026 Release 01 (data file dated September 8, 2026). Imported into CaseTrail November 5, 2026. Coverage: decisions from the 1946 through 2025 Terms. Methodology · Report an error