Board of Regents of the University of Wisconsin System v. Scott Harold Southworth
529 U.S. 217 · Decided March 22, 2000 · Supreme Court of the United States
At a glance
Board of Regents of the University of Wisconsin System v. Scott Harold Southworth was decided on March 22, 2000 unanimously (9–0). The Court reversed the lower court's decision and remanded the case. Justice Anthony M. Kennedy wrote the opinion of the Court. SCDB classifies its main issue as “First Amendment, miscellaneous” in the First Amendment area.
Read the opinion
Case details
- Citations
- 529 U.S. 217 · 120 S. Ct. 1346 · 146 L. Ed. 2d 193 · 2000 U.S. LEXIS 2196
- Docket number
- 98-1189
- Decided
- March 22, 2000
- Argued
- November 9, 1999
- Court era
- Rehnquist Court
- Decision type
- Opinion of the Court (orally argued)
- Disposition
- Reversed and remanded
- Outcome for petitioner
- The petitioning party received a favorable disposition
- Vote
- 9–0 (unanimous)
- Majority opinion
- Anthony M. Kennedy
- Opinion assigned by
- William H. Rehnquist
- How the case arrived
- Certiorari
- Issue (SCDB)
- First Amendment, miscellaneous
- Issue area
- First Amendment
- Legal provision
- First Amendment (speech, press, and assembly)
- Type of law
- Constitutional amendment
- Decision direction (SCDB)
- Conservative what this means
How the Justices voted
| Justice | Vote | Separate writing |
|---|---|---|
| Chief Justice William H. Rehnquist | Majority | |
| Justice John Paul Stevens | Special concurrence | |
| Justice Sandra Day O'Connor | Majority | |
| Justice Antonin Scalia | Majority | |
| Justice Anthony M. Kennedy | Majority | Wrote an opinion |
| Justice David H. Souter | Special concurrence | Wrote an opinion |
| Justice Clarence Thomas | Majority | |
| Justice Ruth Bader Ginsburg | Majority | |
| Justice Stephen G. Breyer | Special concurrence |
Full case caption
Board of Regents of the University of Wisconsin System v. Scott Harold Southworth, et al.
SCDB identifiers: case 1999-041, docket 1999-041-01.
Related decisions
Other cases on “First Amendment, miscellaneous”
- United States v. Playboy Entertainment Group, Inc.Law held unconstitutional
- Legal Services Corporation v. Carmen VelazquezLaw held unconstitutional
- Robert Shaw v. Kevin Murphy
- Victoria Buckley v. American Constitutional Law Foundation, Inc.Law held unconstitutional
- National Endowment for the Arts v. Karen Finley
- Caren Cronk Thomas and Windy City Hemp Development Board v. Chicago Park District
Cases on the same legal provision: First Amendment (speech, press, and assembly)
- City of Erie v. Pap's A. M.
- Jeremiah W. (Jay) Nixon v. Shrink Missouri Government Pac
- Boy Scouts of America and Monmouth Council v. James DaleLaw held unconstitutional
- Leila Jeanne Hill v. Colorado
- Los Angeles Police Department v. United Reporting Publishing Corporation
- Greater New Orleans Broadcasting Association, Inc., Etc. v. United StatesLaw held unconstitutional
Same Term, same area (First Amendment)
- Los Angeles Police Department v. United Reporting Publishing Corporation
- Jeremiah W. (Jay) Nixon v. Shrink Missouri Government Pac
- City of Erie v. Pap's A. M.
- United States v. Playboy Entertainment Group, Inc.Law held unconstitutional
- Santa Fe Independent School District v. Jane Doe
- Guy Mitchell v. Mary L. HelmsAltered precedent
Source: Supreme Court Database, 2026 Release 01 (data file dated September 8, 2026). Imported into CaseTrail November 5, 2026. Coverage: decisions from the 1946 through 2025 Terms. Methodology · Report an error