Board of Estimate of City of New York v. Morris
489 U.S. 688 · Decided March 22, 1989 · Supreme Court of the United States
At a glance
Board of Estimate of City of New York v. Morris was decided on March 22, 1989 unanimously (9–0). The Court affirmed the lower court's decision. Justice Byron R. White wrote the opinion of the Court. SCDB classifies its main issue as “Reapportionment (other than Voting Rights Act plans)” in the Civil Rights area. SCDB records that the Court declared a municipal or other local ordinance unconstitutional.
Read the opinion
Case details
- Citations
- 489 U.S. 688 · 109 S. Ct. 1433 · 103 L. Ed. 2d 717 · 1989 U.S. LEXIS 1573
- Docket number
- 87-1022
- Decided
- March 22, 1989
- Argued
- December 7, 1988
- Court era
- Rehnquist Court
- Decision type
- Opinion of the Court (orally argued)
- Disposition
- Affirmed
- Outcome for petitioner
- The petitioning party did not receive a favorable disposition
- Vote
- 9–0 (unanimous)
- Majority opinion
- Byron R. White
- Opinion assigned by
- William H. Rehnquist
- How the case arrived
- Appeal
- Issue area
- Civil Rights
- Legal provision
- Fourteenth Amendment (equal protection)
- Type of law
- Constitutional amendment
- Held unconstitutional
- A municipal or other local ordinance
- Decision direction (SCDB)
- Liberal what this means
How the Justices voted
| Justice | Vote | Separate writing |
|---|---|---|
| Justice William J. Brennan Jr. | Special concurrence | Wrote an opinion |
| Justice Byron R. White | Majority | Wrote an opinion |
| Justice Thurgood Marshall | Majority | |
| Justice Harry A. Blackmun | Special concurrence | Wrote an opinion |
| Chief Justice William H. Rehnquist | Majority | |
| Justice John Paul Stevens | Special concurrence | |
| Justice Sandra Day O'Connor | Majority | |
| Justice Antonin Scalia | Majority | |
| Justice Anthony M. Kennedy | Majority |
Full case caption
Board of Estimate of City of New York et al. v. Morris et al.
SCDB identifiers: case 1988-056, docket 1988-056-01.
Related decisions
Other cases on “Reapportionment (other than Voting Rights Act plans)”
- Quinn v. MillsapLaw held unconstitutional
- Davis v. Bandemer
- United States Department of Commerce v. Montana
- George Voinovich v. Barney Quilter
- Ruth O. Shaw v. Janet Reno
- Karcher v. DaggettLaw held unconstitutional
Cases on the same legal provision: Fourteenth Amendment (equal protection)
- City of Richmond v. J. A. Croson CompanyLaw held unconstitutional
- Allegheny Pittsburgh Coal Co. v. County Commission of Webster CountyLaw held unconstitutional
- Penson v. Ohio
- Clark v. JeterLaw held unconstitutional
- Bankers Life & Casualty Co. v. Crenshaw
- Board of Education of Oklahoma City Public Schools v. Robert L. Dowell
Same Term, same area (Civil Rights)
- Town of Huntington v. Huntington Branch
- Penson v. Ohio
- Pittston Coal Group v. Sebben
- Owens v. Okure
- City of Richmond v. J. A. Croson CompanyLaw held unconstitutional
- In re McDonald
Source: Supreme Court Database, 2026 Release 01 (data file dated September 8, 2026). Imported into CaseTrail November 5, 2026. Coverage: decisions from the 1946 through 2025 Terms. Methodology · Report an error