CaseTrail

Bart v. United States

349 U.S. 219 · Decided May 23, 1955 · Supreme Court of the United States

Record summary. This page is generated from the Supreme Court Database’s coded data about the case. It describes who decided what, not the Court’s reasoning. Read the opinion itself before relying on it. Not legal advice.

At a glance

Bart v. United States was decided on May 23, 1955 by a vote of 6–3. The Court reversed the lower court's decision and remanded the case. Chief Justice Earl Warren wrote the opinion of the Court. SCDB classifies its main issue as “Self-incrimination (general)” in the Criminal Procedure area.

Read the opinion

Case details

Citations
349 U.S. 219 · 75 S. Ct. 712 · 99 L. Ed. 2d 1016 · 1955 U.S. LEXIS 1441
Docket number
117
Decided
May 23, 1955
Argued
April 5, 1955
Court era
Warren Court
Decision type
Opinion of the Court (orally argued)
Disposition
Reversed and remanded
Outcome for petitioner
The petitioning party received a favorable disposition
Vote
6–3
Majority opinion
Earl Warren
Opinion assigned by
Earl Warren
How the case arrived
Certiorari
Legal provision
2 U.S.C. § 192
Type of law
Infrequently litigated statute
Decision direction (SCDB)
Liberal what this means

How the Justices voted

JusticeVoteSeparate writing
Justice Hugo L. BlackMajority
Justice Stanley F. ReedDissentWrote an opinion
Justice Felix FrankfurterMajority
Justice William O. DouglasMajority
Justice Harold H. BurtonMajority
Justice Tom C. ClarkMajority
Justice Sherman MintonDissent
Chief Justice Earl WarrenMajorityWrote an opinion
Justice John M. Harlan IIDissentWrote an opinion

Full case caption

Bart v. United States

SCDB identifiers: case 1954-080, docket 1954-080-01.

Other cases on “Self-incrimination (general)”

See all

Cases on the same legal provision: 2 U.S.C. § 192

Same Term, same area (Criminal Procedure)

See all

Source: Supreme Court Database, 2026 Release 01 (data file dated September 8, 2026). Imported into CaseTrail November 5, 2026. Coverage: decisions from the 1946 through 2025 Terms. Methodology · Report an error