CaseTrail

Barion Perry v. New Hampshire

565 U.S. 228 · Decided January 11, 2012 · Supreme Court of the United States

Record summary. This page is generated from the Supreme Court Database’s coded data about the case. It describes who decided what, not the Court’s reasoning. Read the opinion itself before relying on it. Not legal advice.

At a glance

Barion Perry v. New Hampshire was decided on January 11, 2012 by a vote of 8–1. The Court affirmed the lower court's decision. Justice Ruth Bader Ginsburg wrote the opinion of the Court. SCDB classifies its main issue as “Line-up identification” in the Criminal Procedure area.

Read the opinion

Case details

Citations
565 U.S. 228 · 132 S. Ct. 716 · 181 L. Ed. 2d 694 · 2012 U.S. LEXIS 579
Docket number
10-8974
Decided
January 11, 2012
Argued
November 2, 2011
Court era
Roberts Court
Decision type
Opinion of the Court (orally argued)
Disposition
Affirmed
Outcome for petitioner
The petitioning party did not receive a favorable disposition
Vote
8–1
Majority opinion
Ruth Bader Ginsburg
Opinion assigned by
John G. Roberts Jr.
How the case arrived
Certiorari
Legal provision
Fourteenth Amendment (due process)
Type of law
Constitutional amendment
Decision direction (SCDB)
Conservative what this means

How the Justices voted

Full case caption

Barion Perry v. New Hampshire

SCDB identifiers: case 2011-009, docket 2011-009-01.

Other cases on “Line-up identification”

See all

Cases on the same legal provision: Fourteenth Amendment (due process)

Same Term, same area (Criminal Procedure)

See all

Source: Supreme Court Database, 2026 Release 01 (data file dated September 8, 2026). Imported into CaseTrail November 5, 2026. Coverage: decisions from the 1946 through 2025 Terms. Methodology · Report an error