Babcock v. Kijakazi
142 S. Ct. 641 · Decided January 13, 2022 · Supreme Court of the United States
Record summary. This page is generated from the Supreme Court Database’s coded data about the case. It describes who decided what, not the Court’s reasoning. Read the opinion itself before relying on it. Not legal advice.
At a glance
Babcock v. Kijakazi was decided on January 13, 2022 by a vote of 8–1. The Court affirmed the lower court's decision. Justice Amy Coney Barrett wrote the opinion of the Court. SCDB classifies its main issue as “Judicial review of agency actions” in the Judicial Power area.
Read the opinion
- CourtListener (Free Law Project) — opinion text
- Supreme Court of the United States — slip opinions, October Term 2021
- Supreme Court of the United States — docket 20-480
Case details
- Citations
- 142 S. Ct. 641 · 211 L. Ed. 2d 424 · 2022 U.S. LEXIS 494
- Docket number
- 20-480
- Decided
- January 13, 2022
- Argued
- October 13, 2021
- Court era
- Roberts Court
- Decision type
- Opinion of the Court (orally argued)
- Disposition
- Affirmed
- Outcome for petitioner
- The petitioning party did not receive a favorable disposition
- Vote
- 8–1
- Majority opinion
- Amy Coney Barrett
- Opinion assigned by
- John G. Roberts Jr.
- How the case arrived
- Certiorari
- Issue (SCDB)
- Judicial review of agency actions
- Issue area
- Judicial Power
- Legal provision
- Social Security Act
- Type of law
- Federal statute
- Decision direction (SCDB)
- Conservative what this means
How the Justices voted
| Justice | Vote | Separate writing |
|---|---|---|
| Justice Clarence Thomas | Majority | |
| Justice Stephen G. Breyer | Majority | |
| Chief Justice John G. Roberts Jr. | Majority | |
| Justice Samuel A. Alito Jr. | Majority | |
| Justice Sonia Sotomayor | Majority | |
| Justice Elena Kagan | Majority | |
| Justice Neil M. Gorsuch | Dissent | Wrote an opinion |
| Justice Brett M. Kavanaugh | Majority | |
| Justice Amy Coney Barrett | Majority | Wrote an opinion |
Full case caption
Babcock v. Kijakazi
SCDB identifiers: case 2021-009, docket 2021-009-01.
Related decisions
Other cases on “Judicial review of agency actions”
- Carr v. Saul
- Axon Enterprise v. Federal Trade Commission
- Little Sisters of the Poor Saints Peter and Paul Home v. Pennsylvania
- Department of Commerce v. New York
- Kisor v. Wilkie
- Azar v. Allina Health Services
Cases on the same legal provision: Social Security Act
- Smith v. Berryhill
- Biestek v. Berryhill
- Culbertson v. Berryhill
- Michael J. Astrue v. Karen K. Capato
- Mayo Foundation for Medical Education and Research v. United States
- Jo Anne B. Barnhart v. Pauline Thomas
Same Term, same area (Judicial Power)
Source: Supreme Court Database, 2026 Release 01 (data file dated September 8, 2026). Imported into CaseTrail November 5, 2026. Coverage: decisions from the 1946 through 2025 Terms. Methodology · Report an error