Astrup v. Immigration and Naturalization Service
402 U.S. 509 · Decided May 24, 1971 · Supreme Court of the United States
Record summary. This page is generated from the Supreme Court Database’s coded data about the case. It describes who decided what, not the Court’s reasoning. Read the opinion itself before relying on it. Not legal advice.
At a glance
Astrup v. Immigration and Naturalization Service was decided on May 24, 1971 unanimously (9–0). The Court reversed the lower court's decision. Justice Hugo L. Black wrote the opinion of the Court. SCDB classifies its main issue as “Immigration, citizenship” in the Civil Rights area.
Read the opinion
Case details
- Citations
- 402 U.S. 509 · 91 S. Ct. 1583 · 29 L. Ed. 2d 68 · 1971 U.S. LEXIS 40
- Docket number
- 840
- Decided
- May 24, 1971
- Argued
- April 20, 1971
- Court era
- Burger Court
- Decision type
- Opinion of the Court (orally argued)
- Disposition
- Reversed
- Outcome for petitioner
- The petitioning party received a favorable disposition
- Vote
- 9–0 (unanimous)
- Majority opinion
- Hugo L. Black
- Opinion assigned by
- Warren E. Burger
- How the case arrived
- Certiorari
- Issue (SCDB)
- Immigration, citizenship
- Issue area
- Civil Rights
- Legal provision
- Selective Service statutes
- Type of law
- Federal statute
- Decision direction (SCDB)
- Liberal what this means
How the Justices voted
| Justice | Vote | Separate writing |
|---|---|---|
| Justice Hugo L. Black | Majority | Wrote an opinion |
| Justice William O. Douglas | Majority | |
| Justice John M. Harlan II | Majority | |
| Justice William J. Brennan Jr. | Majority | |
| Justice Potter Stewart | Majority | |
| Justice Byron R. White | Majority | |
| Justice Thurgood Marshall | Majority | |
| Chief Justice Warren E. Burger | Majority | |
| Justice Harry A. Blackmun | Majority |
Full case caption
Astrup v. Immigration and Naturalization Service
SCDB identifiers: case 1970-103, docket 1970-103-01.
Related decisions
Other cases on “Immigration, citizenship”
- United States Immigration and Naturalization Service v. Hibi
- Berenyi v. District Director
- Montana v. Kennedy
- Mackey v. Mendoza-Martinez
- Tak Shan Fong v. United States
- Immigration and Naturalization Service v. Pangilinan
Cases on the same legal provision: Selective Service statutes
- Ehlert v. United States
- Clay v. United States
- Gillette v. United States
- United States v. Weller
- Fein v. Selective Service System Local Board No. 7 of Yonkers
- Welsh v. United States
Same Term, same area (Civil Rights)
- Oregon v. MitchellLaw held unconstitutional
- Perkins v. Matthews
- Kennerly v. District Court of the Ninth Judicial District of Montana
- Phillips v. Martin Marietta Corp.
- Relford v. Commandant, U.S. Disciplinary Barracks, Ft. Leavenworth
- Boddie v. ConnecticutLaw held unconstitutional
Source: Supreme Court Database, 2026 Release 01 (data file dated September 8, 2026). Imported into CaseTrail November 5, 2026. Coverage: decisions from the 1946 through 2025 Terms. Methodology · Report an error