CaseTrail

Associated Food Retailers of Greater Chicago, Inc. v. Jewel Tea Co., Inc.

381 U.S. 761 · Decided June 7, 1965 · Supreme Court of the United States

Record summary. This page is generated from the Supreme Court Database’s coded data about the case. It describes who decided what, not the Court’s reasoning. Read the opinion itself before relying on it. Not legal advice.

At a glance

Associated Food Retailers of Greater Chicago, Inc. v. Jewel Tea Co., Inc. was decided on June 7, 1965 by a vote of 6–3. The Court reversed the lower court's decision. The decision was issued per curiam (an unsigned opinion of the Court). SCDB classifies its main issue as “Union antitrust” in the Unions area.

Read the opinion

Case details

Citations
381 U.S. 761 · 85 S. Ct. 1797 · 14 L. Ed. 2d 713 · 1965 U.S. LEXIS 978
Docket number
321
Decided
June 7, 1965
Court era
Warren Court
Decision type
Per curiam (no oral argument)
Disposition
Reversed
Outcome for petitioner
The petitioning party received a favorable disposition
Vote
6–3
Opinion assigned by
Earl Warren
How the case arrived
Certiorari
Issue (SCDB)
Union antitrust
Issue area
Unions
Decision direction (SCDB)
Conservative what this means

How the Justices voted

JusticeVoteSeparate writing
Justice Hugo L. BlackDissent
Justice William O. DouglasDissent
Justice Tom C. ClarkDissent
Chief Justice Earl WarrenMajority
Justice John M. Harlan IISpecial concurrenceCo-authored an opinion
Justice William J. Brennan Jr.Majority
Justice Potter StewartSpecial concurrenceCo-authored an opinion
Justice Byron R. WhiteMajority
Justice Arthur J. GoldbergSpecial concurrenceCo-authored an opinion

Full case caption

Associated Food Retailers of Greater Chicago, Inc., et al. v. Jewel Tea Co., Inc.

SCDB identifiers: case 1964-133, docket 1964-133-01.

Other cases on “Union antitrust”

See all

Same Term, same area (Unions)

See all

Source: Supreme Court Database, 2026 Release 01 (data file dated September 8, 2026). Imported into CaseTrail November 5, 2026. Coverage: decisions from the 1946 through 2025 Terms. Methodology · Report an error