Arthur S. Lujan v. G & G Fire Sprinklers, Inc.
532 U.S. 189 · Decided April 17, 2001 · Supreme Court of the United States
Record summary. This page is generated from the Supreme Court Database’s coded data about the case. It describes who decided what, not the Court’s reasoning. Read the opinion itself before relying on it. Not legal advice.
At a glance
Arthur S. Lujan v. G & G Fire Sprinklers, Inc. was decided on April 17, 2001 unanimously (9–0). The Court reversed the lower court's decision. Chief Justice William H. Rehnquist wrote the opinion of the Court. SCDB classifies its main issue as “Due process, hearing or notice” in the Due Process area.
Read the opinion
Case details
- Citations
- 532 U.S. 189 · 121 S. Ct. 1446 · 149 L. Ed. 2d 391 · 2001 U.S. LEXIS 3204
- Docket number
- 00-152
- Decided
- April 17, 2001
- Argued
- February 26, 2001
- Court era
- Rehnquist Court
- Decision type
- Opinion of the Court (orally argued)
- Disposition
- Reversed
- Outcome for petitioner
- The petitioning party received a favorable disposition
- Vote
- 9–0 (unanimous)
- Majority opinion
- William H. Rehnquist
- Opinion assigned by
- William H. Rehnquist
- How the case arrived
- Certiorari
- Issue (SCDB)
- Due process, hearing or notice
- Issue area
- Due Process
- Legal provision
- Fourteenth Amendment (due process)
- Type of law
- Constitutional amendment
- Decision direction (SCDB)
- Conservative what this means
How the Justices voted
| Justice | Vote | Separate writing |
|---|---|---|
| Chief Justice William H. Rehnquist | Majority | Wrote an opinion |
| Justice John Paul Stevens | Majority | |
| Justice Sandra Day O'Connor | Majority | |
| Justice Antonin Scalia | Majority | |
| Justice Anthony M. Kennedy | Majority | |
| Justice David H. Souter | Majority | |
| Justice Clarence Thomas | Majority | |
| Justice Ruth Bader Ginsburg | Majority | |
| Justice Stephen G. Breyer | Majority |
Full case caption
Arthur S. Lujan, Labor Commissioner of California, et al. v. G & G Fire Sprinklers, Inc.
SCDB identifiers: case 2000-038, docket 2000-038-01.
Related decisions
Other cases on “Due process, hearing or notice”
- Wilbert K. Rogers v. Tennessee
- Larry Dean Dusenbery v. United States
- Donald E. Nelson v. Adams
- City of Los Angeles v. Edwin F. David
- City of West Covina v. Lawrence Perkins
- Yaser Esam Hamdi and Esam Fouad Hamdi as Next Friend of Yaser Esam Hamdi v. Donald H. Rumsfeld
Cases on the same legal provision: Fourteenth Amendment (due process)
- Wesley Aaron Shafer, Jr. v. South Carolina
- Brentwood Academy v. Tennessee Secondary School Athletic Association
- William Fiore v. Gregory White
- William Arthur Kelly v. South Carolina
- Kansas v. Michael T. Crane
- Don Stenberg v. Leroy CarhartLaw held unconstitutional
Same Term, same area (Due Process)
- William Fiore v. Gregory White
- Mark Seling v. Andre Brigham Young
- Brentwood Academy v. Tennessee Secondary School Athletic Association
- Wilbert K. Rogers v. Tennessee
- Anthony Palazzolo v. Rhode Island
Source: Supreme Court Database, 2026 Release 01 (data file dated September 8, 2026). Imported into CaseTrail November 5, 2026. Coverage: decisions from the 1946 through 2025 Terms. Methodology · Report an error