CaseTrail

Arlington Central School District Board of Education v. Pearl Murphy et Vir

548 U.S. 291 · Decided June 26, 2006 · Supreme Court of the United States

Record summary. This page is generated from the Supreme Court Database’s coded data about the case. It describes who decided what, not the Court’s reasoning. Read the opinion itself before relying on it. Not legal advice.

At a glance

Arlington Central School District Board of Education v. Pearl Murphy et Vir was decided on June 26, 2006 by a vote of 6–3. The Court reversed the lower court's decision and remanded the case. Justice Samuel A. Alito Jr. wrote the opinion of the Court. SCDB classifies its main issue as “Attorneys' and officials' fees, compensation, or licenses” in the Attorneys area.

Read the opinion

Case details

Citations
548 U.S. 291 · 126 S. Ct. 2455 · 165 L. Ed. 2d 526 · 2006 U.S. LEXIS 5162
Docket number
05-18
Decided
June 26, 2006
Argued
April 19, 2006
Court era
Roberts Court
Decision type
Opinion of the Court (orally argued)
Disposition
Reversed and remanded
Outcome for petitioner
The petitioning party received a favorable disposition
Vote
6–3
Majority opinion
Samuel A. Alito Jr.
Opinion assigned by
John G. Roberts Jr.
How the case arrived
Certiorari
Issue area
Attorneys
Legal provision
Individuals with Disabilities Education Act and related statutes
Type of law
Federal statute
Decision direction (SCDB)
Conservative what this means

How the Justices voted

JusticeVoteSeparate writing
Justice John Paul StevensDissent
Justice Antonin ScaliaMajority
Justice Anthony M. KennedyMajority
Justice David H. SouterDissentWrote an opinion
Justice Clarence ThomasMajority
Justice Ruth Bader GinsburgSpecial concurrenceWrote an opinion
Justice Stephen G. BreyerDissentWrote an opinion
Chief Justice John G. Roberts Jr.Majority
Justice Samuel A. Alito Jr.MajorityWrote an opinion

Full case caption

Arlington Central School District Board of Education v. Pearl Murphy et Vir

SCDB identifiers: case 2005-082, docket 2005-082-01.

Other cases on “Attorneys' and officials' fees, compensation, or licenses”

See all

Cases on the same legal provision: Individuals with Disabilities Education Act and related statutes

Same Term, same area (Attorneys)

See all

Source: Supreme Court Database, 2026 Release 01 (data file dated September 8, 2026). Imported into CaseTrail November 5, 2026. Coverage: decisions from the 1946 through 2025 Terms. Methodology · Report an error