Anonymous Nos. 6 and 7 v. Baker
360 U.S. 287 · Decided June 15, 1959 · Supreme Court of the United States
Record summary. This page is generated from the Supreme Court Database’s coded data about the case. It describes who decided what, not the Court’s reasoning. Read the opinion itself before relying on it. Not legal advice.
At a glance
Anonymous Nos. 6 and 7 v. Baker was decided on June 15, 1959 by a vote of 5–4. The Court affirmed the lower court's decision. Justice John M. Harlan II wrote the opinion of the Court. SCDB classifies its main issue as “Right to counsel” in the Criminal Procedure area.
Read the opinion
Case details
- Citations
- 360 U.S. 287 · 79 S. Ct. 1157 · 3 L. Ed. 2d 1234 · 1959 U.S. LEXIS 813
- Docket number
- 378
- Decided
- June 15, 1959
- Argued
- March 25, 1959
- Court era
- Warren Court
- Decision type
- Opinion of the Court (orally argued)
- Disposition
- Affirmed
- Outcome for petitioner
- The petitioning party did not receive a favorable disposition
- Vote
- 5–4
- Majority opinion
- John M. Harlan II
- Opinion assigned by
- Felix Frankfurter
- How the case arrived
- Certiorari
- Issue (SCDB)
- Right to counsel
- Issue area
- Criminal Procedure
- Legal provision
- 28 U.S.C. § 1257
- Type of law
- Infrequently litigated statute
- Decision direction (SCDB)
- Conservative what this means
How the Justices voted
| Justice | Vote | Separate writing |
|---|---|---|
| Justice Hugo L. Black | Dissent | Wrote an opinion |
| Justice Felix Frankfurter | Majority | |
| Justice William O. Douglas | Dissent | |
| Justice Tom C. Clark | Majority | |
| Chief Justice Earl Warren | Dissent | |
| Justice John M. Harlan II | Majority | Wrote an opinion |
| Justice William J. Brennan Jr. | Dissent | |
| Justice Charles E. Whittaker | Majority | |
| Justice Potter Stewart | Majority |
Full case caption
Anonymous Nos. 6 and 7 v. Baker, Justice of the Supreme Court of New York
SCDB identifiers: case 1958-113, docket 1958-113-01.
Related decisions
Other cases on “Right to counsel”
- Cash v. Culver
- Hudson v. North Carolina
- Moore v. Michigan
- McNeal v. Culver
- Reynolds v. Cochran
- Ferguson v. GeorgiaLaw held unconstitutional
Cases on the same legal provision: 28 U.S.C. § 1257
- Burns v. Ohio
- Raley v. Ohio
- Rohr Aircraft Corp. v. County of San DiegoLaw held unconstitutional
- Marcus v. Search Warrant of Property at 104 East Tenth StreetLaw held unconstitutional
- Lathrop v. Donohue
- Gotthilf v. Sills
Same Term, same area (Criminal Procedure)
- Hawkins v. United States
- Ladner v. United StatesAltered precedent
- United States ex Rel. Jennings v. Ragen
- Draper v. United States
- Greene v. United States
- Heflin v. United States
Source: Supreme Court Database, 2026 Release 01 (data file dated September 8, 2026). Imported into CaseTrail November 5, 2026. Coverage: decisions from the 1946 through 2025 Terms. Methodology · Report an error