Anderson v. Yungkau
329 U.S. 482 · Decided January 13, 1947 · Supreme Court of the United States
Record summary. This page is generated from the Supreme Court Database’s coded data about the case. It describes who decided what, not the Court’s reasoning. Read the opinion itself before relying on it. Not legal advice.
At a glance
Anderson v. Yungkau was decided on January 13, 1947 by a vote of 5–2. The Court affirmed the lower court's decision. Justice William O. Douglas wrote the opinion of the Court. SCDB classifies its main issue as “Federal rules of civil procedure” in the Judicial Power area.
Read the opinion
Case details
- Citations
- 329 U.S. 482 · 67 S. Ct. 428 · 91 L. Ed. 436 · 1947 U.S. LEXIS 2965
- Docket number
- 87
- Decided
- January 13, 1947
- Argued
- December 19, 1946
- Court era
- Vinson Court
- Decision type
- Opinion of the Court (orally argued)
- Disposition
- Affirmed
- Outcome for petitioner
- The petitioning party did not receive a favorable disposition
- Vote
- 5–2
- Majority opinion
- William O. Douglas
- Opinion assigned by
- Hugo L. Black
- How the case arrived
- Certiorari
- Issue (SCDB)
- Federal rules of civil procedure
- Issue area
- Judicial Power
- Legal provision
- Federal Rules of Civil or Appellate Procedure
- Type of law
- Court rules
- Decision direction (SCDB)
- Conservative what this means
How the Justices voted
| Justice | Vote | Separate writing |
|---|---|---|
| Justice Hugo L. Black | Majority | |
| Justice Felix Frankfurter | Majority | |
| Justice William O. Douglas | Majority | Wrote an opinion |
| Justice Frank Murphy | Majority | |
| Justice Robert H. Jackson | Majority | |
| Justice Wiley B. Rutledge | Dissent | Wrote an opinion |
| Justice Harold H. Burton | Dissent |
Did not participate: Stanley F. Reed, Fred M. Vinson.
Full case caption
Anderson, Receiver, v. Yungkau, Executor, et al.
SCDB identifiers: case 1946-034, docket 1946-034-01.
Related decisions
Other cases on “Federal rules of civil procedure”
- Globe Liquor Co., Inc. v. San Roman
- Sutphen Estates, Inc. v. United States
- Johnson v. New York
- Sears v. Mackey
- Cold Metal Process Co. v. United Engineering & Foundry Co.
- United States v. F. & M. Schaefer Brewing Co.
Cases on the same legal provision: Federal Rules of Civil or Appellate Procedure
- Jesionowski v. Boston & Maine Railroad
- Hickman v. Taylor
- Cone v. West Virginia Pulp & Paper Co.
- Koster v. (American) Lumbermens Mutual Casualty Co.
- Land v. Dollar
- Fleming v. Mohawk Wrecking & Lumber Co.
Same Term, same area (Judicial Power)
- Alma Motor Co. v. Timken-Detroit Axle Co.
- Order of Railway Conductors of America v. Swan
- Parker v. Fleming
- Patterson v. Lamb
- United Public Workers of America v. Mitchell
- Angel v. BullingtonAltered precedent
Source: Supreme Court Database, 2026 Release 01 (data file dated September 8, 2026). Imported into CaseTrail November 5, 2026. Coverage: decisions from the 1946 through 2025 Terms. Methodology · Report an error