Alleghany Corporation v. Breswick & Co.
355 U.S. 415 · Decided January 27, 1958 · Supreme Court of the United States
Record summary. This page is generated from the Supreme Court Database’s coded data about the case. It describes who decided what, not the Court’s reasoning. Read the opinion itself before relying on it. Not legal advice.
At a glance
Alleghany Corporation v. Breswick & Co. was decided on January 27, 1958 by a vote of 6–3. The Court reversed the lower court's decision and remanded the case. The decision was issued per curiam (an unsigned opinion of the Court). SCDB classifies its main issue as “Railroad regulation” in the Economic Activity area.
Read the opinion
Case details
- Citations
- 355 U.S. 415 · 78 S. Ct. 421 · 2 L. Ed. 2d 374 · 1958 U.S. LEXIS 1788
- Docket number
- 616
- Decided
- January 27, 1958
- Court era
- Warren Court
- Decision type
- Per curiam (no oral argument)
- Disposition
- Reversed and remanded
- Outcome for petitioner
- The petitioning party received a favorable disposition
- Vote
- 6–3
- Opinion assigned by
- Felix Frankfurter
- How the case arrived
- Appeal
- Issue (SCDB)
- Railroad regulation
- Issue area
- Economic Activity
- Legal provision
- Interstate Commerce Act
- Type of law
- Federal statute
- Decision direction (SCDB)
- Conservative what this means
How the Justices voted
| Justice | Vote | Separate writing |
|---|---|---|
| Justice Hugo L. Black | Dissent | |
| Justice Felix Frankfurter | Majority | |
| Justice William O. Douglas | Dissent | Wrote an opinion |
| Justice Harold H. Burton | Majority | |
| Justice Tom C. Clark | Majority | |
| Chief Justice Earl Warren | Dissent | |
| Justice John M. Harlan II | Majority | |
| Justice William J. Brennan Jr. | Majority | |
| Justice Charles E. Whittaker | Majority |
Full case caption
Alleghany Corporation v. Breswick & Co. et al.
SCDB identifiers: case 1957-045, docket 1957-045-01.
Related decisions
Other cases on “Railroad regulation”
- Chicago v. Illinois
- California v. Taylor
- Alleghany Corporation v. Breswick & Co.
- Boston & Maine Railroad v. United States
- United States v. Interstate Commerce Commission
- Denver & Rio Grande Western Railroad Co. v. Union Pacific Railroad Co.
Cases on the same legal provision: Interstate Commerce Act
- County of Marin v. United States
- Public Service Commission of Utah v. United States
- Pan-Atlantic Steamship Corp. v. Atlantic Coast Line Railroad Co.
- American Trucking Associations, Inc. v. Frisco Transportation Co.
- United States v. Western Pacific Railroad Co.
- United States v. Chesapeake & Ohio Railway Co.
Same Term, same area (Economic Activity)
- Gibson v. Thompson
- Palermo v. Luckenbach Steamship Co., Inc.
- Black v. Magnolia Liquor Co., Inc.
- Stinson v. Atlantic Coast Line Railroad Co.
- Schaffer Transportation Co. v. United States
- American Trucking Associations, Inc. v. United States
Source: Supreme Court Database, 2026 Release 01 (data file dated September 8, 2026). Imported into CaseTrail November 5, 2026. Coverage: decisions from the 1946 through 2025 Terms. Methodology · Report an error