CaseTrail

Alexander Haig v. Gladys Bissonette

485 U.S. 264 · Decided March 21, 1988 · Supreme Court of the United States

Record summary. This page is generated from the Supreme Court Database’s coded data about the case. It describes who decided what, not the Court’s reasoning. Read the opinion itself before relying on it. Not legal advice.

At a glance

Alexander Haig v. Gladys Bissonette was decided on March 21, 1988 unanimously (5–0). The Court affirmed the lower court's decision. The decision was issued per curiam (an unsigned opinion of the Court). SCDB classifies its main issue as “No merits, miscellaneous” in the Judicial Power area.

Read the opinion

Case details

Citations
485 U.S. 264 · 108 S. Ct. 1253 · 99 L. Ed. 2d 288 · 1988 U.S. LEXIS 1317
Docket number
86-987
Decided
March 21, 1988
Decision type
Per curiam (no oral argument)
Disposition
Affirmed
Outcome for petitioner
The petitioning party did not receive a favorable disposition
Vote
5–0 (unanimous)
Opinion assigned by
William J. Brennan Jr.
How the case arrived
Certiorari
Issue area
Judicial Power
Legal provision
28 U.S.C. § 2109
Type of law
Infrequently litigated statute
Decision direction (SCDB)
Conservative what this means

How the Justices voted

Did not participate: William H. Rehnquist, Sandra Day O'Connor, Antonin Scalia, Anthony M. Kennedy.

Full case caption

Alexander Haig, et al. v. Gladys Bissonette et al.

SCDB identifiers: case 1987-047, docket 1987-047-01.

Other cases on “No merits, miscellaneous”

See all

Same Term, same area (Judicial Power)

See all

Source: Supreme Court Database, 2026 Release 01 (data file dated September 8, 2026). Imported into CaseTrail November 5, 2026. Coverage: decisions from the 1946 through 2025 Terms. Methodology · Report an error