Ala. Legislative Black Caucus v. Alabama
575 U.S. 254 · Decided March 25, 2015 · Supreme Court of the United States
Record summary. This page is generated from the Supreme Court Database’s coded data about the case. It describes who decided what, not the Court’s reasoning. Read the opinion itself before relying on it. Not legal advice.
At a glance
Ala. Legislative Black Caucus v. Alabama was decided on March 25, 2015 by a vote of 5–4. The Court vacated the lower court's decision and remanded the case. Justice Stephen G. Breyer wrote the opinion of the Court. SCDB classifies its main issue as “Reapportionment (other than Voting Rights Act plans)” in the Civil Rights area.
Read the opinion
Case details
- Citations
- 575 U.S. 254 · 135 S. Ct. 1257 · 191 L. Ed. 2d 314 · 2015 U.S. LEXIS 2122
- Docket number
- 13-895
- Decided
- March 25, 2015
- Argued
- November 12, 2014
- Court era
- Roberts Court
- Decision type
- Opinion of the Court (orally argued)
- Disposition
- Vacated and remanded
- Outcome for petitioner
- The petitioning party received a favorable disposition
- Vote
- 5–4
- Majority opinion
- Stephen G. Breyer
- Opinion assigned by
- Anthony M. Kennedy
- How the case arrived
- Appeal
- Issue area
- Civil Rights
- Legal provision
- Fourteenth Amendment (equal protection)
- Type of law
- Constitutional amendment
- Decision direction (SCDB)
- Liberal what this means
How the Justices voted
| Justice | Vote | Separate writing |
|---|---|---|
| Justice Antonin Scalia | Dissent | Wrote an opinion |
| Justice Anthony M. Kennedy | Majority | |
| Justice Clarence Thomas | Dissent | Wrote an opinion |
| Justice Ruth Bader Ginsburg | Majority | |
| Justice Stephen G. Breyer | Majority | Wrote an opinion |
| Chief Justice John G. Roberts Jr. | Dissent | |
| Justice Samuel A. Alito Jr. | Dissent | |
| Justice Sonia Sotomayor | Majority | |
| Justice Elena Kagan | Majority |
Full case caption
Ala. Legislative Black Caucus v. Alabama
SCDB identifiers: case 2014-017, docket 2014-017-01.
Related decisions
Other cases on “Reapportionment (other than Voting Rights Act plans)”
- Arizona State Legislature v. Arizona Independent Redistricting Commission
- Cooper v. HarrisLaw held unconstitutional
- North Carolina v. Covington
- Rick Perry v. Shannon Perez
- North Carolina v. Covington
- Moore v. HarperLaw held unconstitutional
Cases on the same legal provision: Fourteenth Amendment (equal protection)
- Schuette v. Coalition to Defend Affirmative Action
- Evenwel v. Abbott
- Harris v. Arizona Independent Redistricting Commission
- Foster v. Chatman
- Fisher v. University of Texas at Austin
- Abigail Noel Fisher v. University of Texas at Austin
Same Term, same area (Civil Rights)
- Jeremy Carroll v. Andrew Carman
- Christeson v. Roper
- Young v. UPS
- Woods v. Donald
- Coleman v. Tollefson
- City and County of San Francisco v. Sheehan
Source: Supreme Court Database, 2026 Release 01 (data file dated September 8, 2026). Imported into CaseTrail November 5, 2026. Coverage: decisions from the 1946 through 2025 Terms. Methodology · Report an error